Skip to main content
Live Webinar with SANS (June 25)— Agentic CTI Automation for Fun & ProfitRegister Free
Mallory
Back to intelligence
critical-infrastructure-threatindustrial-control-system-vulnerabilityai-platform-securitycybersecurity-regulation

CISA Guidance on AI Integration Risks in Operational Technology

Updated 3mo agoFirst seen Dec 23, 20252 sources

The U.S. Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA), along with international partners, has issued guidance warning operators of critical infrastructure and industrial control systems about the risks of rapidly integrating artificial intelligence into operational technology environments. The guidance includes high-level principles and a checklist of questions for vendors, emphasizing that AI should not be treated as a 'magical black box' but as software that introduces new attack surfaces and risks. CISA's recommendations urge organizations to consider secure-by-design practices and to thoroughly assess the security implications before deploying AI in OT systems.

This advisory comes amid a surge in efforts by OT technology vendors to embed AI into their products over the past 18 to 24 months. The guidance highlights the need for proper risk management and governance, as the rush to adopt AI could expose critical infrastructure to new vulnerabilities if not carefully managed. Operators are encouraged to engage with vendors about their AI development and deployment practices to ensure robust security controls are in place.

Share:
CISA Guidance on AI Integration Risks in Operational Technology
Stay ahead

Get ahead of threats like this

Mallory correlates global threat intelligence with your attack surface — know if you’re exposed before adversaries strike.

EVENT TIMELINE

How this story unfolded

1 event from the most recent confirmed update back to the earliest known activity.

1 EVENTS
Dec 23, 20256mo ago

CISA and international partners issue AI guidance for OT operators

CISA, joined by cybersecurity agencies from Australia, Canada, Germany, the Netherlands, New Zealand, the UK, and others, published high-level principles and a list of 10 risks for critical infrastructure operators considering AI in operational technology and industrial control systems. The guidance urges operators to question vendors about AI use, assess risks such as expanded attack surfaces and supply chain exposure, and apply appropriate risk management.

LINKED ENTITIES

Related entities

Vulnerabilities, threat actors, malware, products, organizations, and breaches Mallory has linked to this story.

5 LINKEDOpen in app
Organizations
5 linked
AnthropicShellDukeRunSafe SecurityPillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman
The operational view lives in Mallory

See the full picture, correlated to your attack surface.

This page covers what’s public. Mallory adds the parts that aren’t — which of your assets are affected, which threat actors are using it right now, which detections to deploy, and what to do next.
Exposure mapping

Map indicators from this story to your assets and identify affected systems in minutes.

Threat actor evidence

Every observed campaign, victim, and pivot linked to actors named in this story.

Associated malware

Malware, exploits, and IOCs connected to the activity described here.

Detection signatures

YARA, Sigma, and Snort rules deployed to your SIEM as soon as they’re published.

Scheduled alerts

Get matching new stories delivered to your team as they break — not the next morning.

AI threads

Ask questions about this story and take action on the answers.

CISA Guidance on AI Integration Risks in Operational Technology | Mallory