NSA Leadership Changes Amid Ongoing Cyber Directorate Turmoil
The National Security Agency (NSA) has undergone significant leadership changes following months of instability at its highest levels. Tim Kosiba, a veteran with over three decades of federal service, has been appointed as the new deputy director of the NSA after the Trump administration removed his predecessor and other top officials, reportedly due to political pressure. Kosiba previously held key roles within the NSA, FBI, and Naval Criminal Investigative Service, and his appointment was confirmed by Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth and Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard with President Trump's approval. The agency has faced a prolonged period without a Senate-confirmed leader, contributing to uncertainty within both the NSA and U.S. Cyber Command.
Simultaneously, the NSA's cybersecurity directorate is also experiencing a transition in leadership. David Imbordino, currently the directorate’s deputy chief, will serve as acting head following the retirement of Greg Smithberger, who had been leading in an interim capacity. Holly Baroody is set to return from the United Kingdom to serve as acting deputy chief. The directorate, established in 2019 to enhance intelligence sharing and collaboration with critical infrastructure, has lacked a permanent chief since early last year. These leadership changes come as the NSA continues to address evolving cyber threats, including recent advisories on malware such as BRICKSTORM, and underscores the agency’s ongoing efforts to stabilize its executive ranks and maintain operational continuity.
Sources
Related Stories
Leadership Turbulence and Strategic Shifts at the NSA Under Trump Administration
The Trump administration reversed its decision to appoint Joe Francescon as the next deputy director of the National Security Agency (NSA), opting instead for Tim Kosiba, a former NSA and FBI official. This change follows internal White House opposition and criticism from far-right activists, highlighting ongoing instability within the NSA's leadership ranks. The agency has faced significant personnel changes and has operated without a Senate-confirmed leader for over eight months, raising concerns about continuity and operational effectiveness. Simultaneously, former national security officials have raised alarms about the administration's new national security strategy, which they argue prioritizes short-term, transactional objectives—such as focusing intelligence resources on Venezuela and hardline migration policies—at the expense of monitoring enduring and emerging threats in Europe, Asia, and other regions. These developments underscore broader concerns about the direction and stability of U.S. intelligence leadership and strategy during this period.
3 months ago
Leadership Changes at U.S. Cyber Command and NSA
U.S. Cyber Command’s Cyber National Mission Force (CNMF) removed Air Force Lt. Col. **Jason Gargan**, a joint task force commander focused on operations against **Russia**, after he was “relieved for cause” following disagreements over operations with CNMF leadership, according to people familiar with the matter. Gargan was reassigned elsewhere within CNMF and is expected to retire by the end of 2026; the move was described as unusual for CNMF, where underperforming leaders are typically rotated rather than dismissed. The personnel action occurred amid broader senior-level churn at Cyber Command, which has reportedly been without a Senate-confirmed leader for an extended period, and as CNMF chief Maj. Gen. **Lorna Mahlock** was nominated to become Cyber Command’s next deputy chief. Separately, the **National Security Agency (NSA)** appointed intelligence community veteran **Timothy Kosiba** as deputy director with presidential approval. Reporting highlighted Kosiba’s background in network warfare and offensive cyber roles (including **Tailored Access Operations**-linked positions) and senior leadership posts supporting foreign signals intelligence and cybersecurity missions; Acting NSA and Cyber Command head **William Hartman** publicly endorsed the appointment as supporting NSA’s mission execution.
2 months agoLeadership Uncertainty at U.S. Cyber Command and NSA Amidst Policy Disarray
U.S. Cyber Command and the National Security Agency have been without a permanent leader for over seven months following the dismissal of Air Force Gen. Timothy Haugh and his deputy, a move that has unsettled both organizations. Army Lt. Gen. Joshua Rudd, currently serving as the No. 2 at U.S. Indo-Pacific Command and lacking direct cyber or signals intelligence experience, has emerged as a leading candidate for the dual-hat leadership role, though the selection process remains fluid and contentious. Key leadership positions at both agencies remain unfilled, with Marine Corps Maj. Gen. Lorna Mahlock and Brig. Gen. Matthew Lennox identified as likely appointees to senior roles once the top post is settled. This leadership vacuum comes as the Trump administration’s official cyber policy calls for stronger deterrence against foreign cyber threats, particularly from China, but President Trump himself has publicly downplayed the significance of such threats. Senior administration officials have highlighted the need to respond to campaigns like those attributed to Salt Typhoon and Volt Typhoon, which target U.S. telecommunications and critical infrastructure, yet the president’s dismissive stance has created a disconnect between policy rhetoric and executive action. The ongoing instability at the helm of the nation’s top cyber agencies raises concerns about the United States’ ability to effectively coordinate and respond to escalating foreign cyber operations.
4 months ago