Phishing and BEC Campaigns Abusing Trusted Platforms and Infrastructure
A wave of phishing activity is leveraging trusted brands and legitimate platform features to increase click-through and evade security controls. LinkedIn users are being targeted via fake “reply” comments posted on public threads that impersonate LinkedIn policy enforcement, claim an account violation, and push victims to external credential-harvesting pages. The lures mimic official branding and sometimes use LinkedIn’s own lnkd.in shortener to obscure destinations; reported redirect chains include Netlify-hosted pages (e.g., very1929412.netlify[.]app) leading to additional domains (e.g., very128918[.]site) designed to capture credentials. LinkedIn stated it is aware of the campaign and emphasized it does not communicate policy violations via public comments.
Separately, RavenMail reported a large-scale email phishing campaign impacting 3,000+ organizations (notably manufacturing) that abused Google infrastructure to bypass defenses: messages were sent via legitimate Google services, passed SPF/DKIM/DMARC, and used trusted Google-hosted URLs and Google Cloud Storage to host payloads and redirectors—without requiring a compromise of Google itself. In parallel trend reporting, LevelBlue SpiderLabs observed BEC volume rising 15% in 2025 based on MailMarshal telemetry (averaging 3,000 intercepted BEC messages per month), with evolving social engineering such as “contact details swapping,” where attackers impersonate finance teams to “update” official contact information to divert payments or data; this underscores continued attacker focus on impersonation and trust exploitation across both social platforms and email ecosystems.

Get ahead of threats like this
Mallory correlates global threat intelligence with your attack surface — know if you’re exposed before adversaries strike.
How this story unfolded
3 events from the most recent confirmed update back to the earliest known activity.
LinkedIn acknowledges scam campaign and begins response
LinkedIn said it was aware of the fake policy-violation comment campaign, was working to address it, and clarified that it does not communicate policy violations through public comments. This marked the platform's official response to the ongoing phishing activity.
Fake LinkedIn policy-violation comment scam targets users
Attackers began flooding LinkedIn posts with fake reply comments impersonating LinkedIn and alleging bogus policy violations or temporary account restrictions. The scam used malicious external links, sometimes obscured with LinkedIn's lnkd.in shortener, to lead victims through phishing pages that harvested credentials.
Phishing campaign abuses Google infrastructure against 3,000+ organizations
RavenMail researchers reported that in December 2025, attackers targeted more than 3,000 organizations, primarily in the manufacturing sector, with phishing emails impersonating routine business notifications. The campaign used legitimate Google-hosted URLs and workflow services to deliver credential-harvesting pages while passing SPF, DKIM, and DMARC checks.
Related entities
Vulnerabilities, threat actors, malware, products, organizations, and breaches Mallory has linked to this story.
Sources
2 references tracked. Mallory keeps watching after this page renders.
See the full picture, correlated to your attack surface.
Map indicators from this story to your assets and identify affected systems in minutes.
Every observed campaign, victim, and pivot linked to actors named in this story.
Malware, exploits, and IOCs connected to the activity described here.
YARA, Sigma, and Snort rules deployed to your SIEM as soon as they’re published.
Get matching new stories delivered to your team as they break — not the next morning.
Ask questions about this story and take action on the answers.


