US Courts Scrutinize Law Enforcement Access to Digital Data via Device Searches and Geofence Warrants
A federal judge ordered the FBI to pause searching devices seized from Washington Post reporter Ellen Nakashima Natanson while the court considers claims that reviewing the contents would violate First Amendment protections for journalists and attorney-client privilege. The Post said the government refused to voluntarily refrain from reviewing the seized items pending judicial resolution, and argued the devices contain extensive journalistic work product, including tens of thousands of emails, interview recordings, story drafts, and encrypted Signal communications with more than 1,100 sources.
Separately, the US Supreme Court agreed to hear a case challenging whether geofence warrants—orders compelling companies (often Google) to provide location data for devices present in a defined area during a specific time—are constitutional under the Fourth Amendment. The case arises from the prosecution of Okello Chatrie, where police used a geofence request to obtain anonymized location data near a robbery scene and then narrowed it to subscriber information; the petition highlights rapid growth in geofence requests and argues the practice is increasingly common despite inconsistent lower-court rulings and limited judicial guidance for balancing investigative needs against user privacy.
Sources
Related Stories
US Scrutiny of Government Access to Commercial and Platform Location Data
US policymakers and courts are intensifying scrutiny of how law enforcement and federal agencies obtain and use location data, amid concerns that current practices can sweep in sensitive information about large numbers of people without adequate safeguards. More than 70 House and Senate Democrats urged DHS Inspector General **Joseph Cuffari** to investigate **ICE** for allegedly resuming **warrantless purchases of Americans’ location data**, including how the data is used, whether employee access is audited, and whether data governance controls exist. Lawmakers cited prior DHS OIG findings that **CBP, the Secret Service, and ICE** violated federal law by purchasing/using location data without warrants and lacked required privacy safeguards; the OIG previously recommended ICE halt use of commercial telemetry data until privacy assessments and compliance controls were implemented. In parallel, the US Supreme Court is poised to address the constitutionality of **geofence (“reverse search”) warrants**, with **Google** filing an amicus brief arguing the warrants are unconstitutional because they can identify all devices in a defined area/time window, capturing many non-suspects’ location data. Google noted it began storing Location History **on-device** in July 2025, limiting its ability to respond to geofence warrants going forward, but said the Court’s ruling could still affect other providers and historical requests; Google also reported objecting to **3,000+** geofence warrants in recent months. The case discussed involves **Okello Chatrie**, identified after police sought Google data placing devices near a 2019 bank robbery, and raises questions about the **third-party doctrine** and whether cloud-stored location data retains constitutional protections.
1 weeks ago
US Government Pressure and Surveillance Allegations Targeting Speech and Media
Civil liberties groups and media advocates are escalating claims that US government entities are pressuring or leveraging authority in ways that chill speech and shape online information flows. The **EFF** is pursuing FOIA litigation to uncover communications between federal officials and technology platforms, arguing that government requests around content moderation—particularly involving criticism of **ICE**—may have crossed from persuasion into unconstitutional coercion; advocates say platforms could resist by demanding court orders and that prior litigation has prompted the government to withdraw certain unmasking requests. Separately, a **GAO** report obtained by *Nextgov/FCW* found the **FBI** used its “assessment” authority from 2018–2024 to collect information on more than 1,000 individuals and organizations—including journalists, religious groups, and elected officials—using tools that can include physical surveillance, subpoenas for electronic communications information, and confidential sources without the evidentiary predicate required for a criminal investigation. In a related speech-and-platform governance dispute, the **FTC chair** sent a letter to Apple alleging *Apple News* suppresses conservative outlets and suggesting potential consumer-protection violations, drawing criticism that the move resembles government pressure over editorial decisions despite the letter citing no specific terms-of-service provisions allegedly breached.
1 months ago
FBI Section 702 Queries of Americans’ Data Increased in 2025
The FBI conducted **7,413 U.S. person queries** of data collected under **Section 702 of FISA** between December 2024 and November 2025, up about **35%** from **5,518** the prior year, according to a March 11 letter from acting Assistant Director **Ted Groves** to congressional judiciary and intelligence leaders. Section 702 allows the government to collect foreign intelligence communications involving non-U.S. persons overseas, but Americans’ communications can be incidentally swept into the same databases and later searched by analysts using selectors such as names, phone numbers, or email addresses. The increase lands as Congress again debates reauthorization of the surveillance authority, which is scheduled to expire on **April 20**, and as civil-liberties concerns remain central to the policy fight. The FBI did not publicly explain the rise in searches, but the letter said the share of queries that returned either content or non-content Section 702 information fell from **38% in 2024** to **28% in 2025**, underscoring ongoing questions about the scope, utility, and oversight of warrantless access to incidentally collected Americans’ data.
4 days ago