US and UK Immigration Agencies Seek Expanded Surveillance and Data-Analytics Capabilities
US Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) issued a federal request for information seeking commercial “Big Data and Ad Tech” products—explicitly including ad-tech compliant and location data services—to “directly support investigative activities,” signaling continued interest in leveraging commercial data-broker and advertising-technology ecosystems for law-enforcement use. Related reporting highlights longstanding concerns that US agencies can sidestep Fourth Amendment warrant requirements by purchasing sensitive data about residents, and notes broader DHS/ICE enforcement activity that has increased scrutiny of surveillance practices and the downstream impacts of ad-tech tracking on affected communities.
Separately, the UK Home Office’s Border Security Command is pursuing up to £100M in procurement for a “maritime situational awareness system” designed to autonomously detect, track, and identify small boats and other non-cooperative vessels, including fusing data from land-based and BVLOS drones into a managed “Coastal Maritime ISR Service.” In parallel, a viral “ICE List” site claimed to publish leaked personal data on thousands of DHS employees, but analysis found the database largely relies on publicly available self-disclosed information (notably LinkedIn), underscoring operational security risks from personnel oversharing even when no breach is involved.
Related Entities
Organizations
Sources
Related Stories
ICE Expands Use of Commercial and Technical Surveillance Data for Immigration Enforcement
U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (**ICE**) is exploring expanded access to commercially available data from online advertising and technology brokers to support investigations, issuing a **Request for Information (RFI)** to understand the availability of personal, financial, location, and health data and how it could be provided to federal investigative entities. The effort is framed as market research rather than a direct procurement, and follows an earlier RFI seeking open-source intelligence and social media data to improve targeting for ICE’s Enforcement and Removal Operations. Privacy and civil liberties advocates warn that purchasing brokered data can function as a workaround to traditional warrant requirements, and point to proposed legislation such as the **Fourth Amendment Is Not For Sale Act** as a potential constraint on government acquisition of data that would otherwise require judicial authorization. Reporting on ICE’s broader deportation and enforcement posture describes the agency’s reliance on multiple surveillance technologies to identify and track individuals, including **cell-site simulators** (also known as *stingrays* / **IMSI catchers**) that impersonate cellular towers to locate and potentially identify nearby phones. The coverage also highlights legal controversy around enforcement tactics, including allegations of warrantless home entry that legal experts argue conflicts with **Fourth Amendment** protections. Separately, European policymakers are described as reassessing dependence on U.S. technology amid geopolitical tensions and sanctions risk, but that discussion is not specific to ICE’s surveillance or data-broker acquisition activity.
1 months ago
U.S. Agencies Expand Efforts to Identify and Share Data on Immigration-Related Targets
Reporting indicates the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has significantly increased its use of **administrative subpoenas**—which do not require judicial approval—to obtain identifying information for anonymous social media accounts that criticize **ICE** or post information about ICE agent locations. According to the New York Times (as cited by TechCrunch), DHS sent **hundreds** of subpoenas to major platforms including **Google, Meta, Reddit, and Discord**, and some companies reportedly complied in at least some cases; Google said it notifies users when possible and challenges subpoenas it views as **overbroad**. Separately, a court filing disclosed that the **IRS improperly overshared** immigrants’ personal data with DHS/ICE under an April 2025 IRS–DHS data-sharing arrangement intended to support certain non-tax criminal investigations under **IRC Section 6103** exceptions. After ICE requested **1.28 million** addresses, the IRS could verify **47,289** individuals, and for a subset (reported as **under 5%** of verified matches) the IRS mistakenly provided ICE with **additional address information** beyond what ICE had supplied, raising concerns that the interagency data-sharing deal increased exposure of sensitive taxpayer information.
1 months ago
Congressional and civil-liberties backlash over ICE/CBP facial recognition and broader domestic surveillance authorities
US lawmakers and civil-liberties advocates are escalating scrutiny of **ICE** and **CBP** use of facial recognition amid reports that immigration agents have used face-scanning tools on people observing or protesting enforcement activity. Proposed legislation dubbed the **“ICE Out of Our Faces Act”** would seek to bar ICE/CBP facial recognition use, alongside related demands to limit tracking of First Amendment activity and questions about whether ICE maintains a “domestic terrorists” database tied to immigration protests. Separately, records reviewed by *WIRED* indicate DHS’s *Mobile Fortify* facial-recognition app—rolled out in 2025 to “determine or verify” identities during operations—cannot reliably **verify** identity and is intended at best to generate investigative leads; the reporting also describes DHS approving the tool after weakening centralized privacy reviews and removing department-wide limits on facial recognition. In parallel, Congress is debating the renewal of **FISA Section 702**, with lawmakers raising concerns that domestic surveillance authorities could be applied more broadly, including in support of immigration-related enforcement framed as a national security issue. Nextgov reports that transparency data shows intelligence agencies increased 702 searches in 2024 using identifiers linked to known or suspected Americans while pursuing foreign cyber and terrorism threats, even as the FBI reduced its own direct U.S.-person queries after new safeguards. A separate Nextgov item on an AI moratorium and sector-specific AI regulation is policy-focused and not directly tied to the ICE/CBP facial recognition deployments or Section 702 reauthorization debate described in the other reporting.
1 months ago