GPT-5.5 Matches or Surpasses Mythos in Offensive Cybersecurity Tests
The UK’s AI Security Institute found that OpenAI’s GPT-5.5 performed at or above the level of Anthropic’s Mythos Preview in offensive cybersecurity evaluations, underscoring a sharp rise in frontier-model cyber capability. In an AISI benchmark built around 95 Capture The Flag challenges, GPT-5.5 reportedly led overall on advanced tasks with a 71.4% score, ahead of Mythos Preview at 68.6% and GPT-5.4 at 52.4%. The tested scenarios included realistic security work such as firmware analysis without source code, exploitation of memory-corruption bugs including use-after-free, cryptographic bypass, attacks on weak random-number generators, and analysis of obfuscated malware.
The results also showed limits: Mythos Preview reportedly remained stronger in longer, multi-step intrusion simulations, including a 32-step exercise known as “The Last Ones,” and neither model completed a simulated industrial-system attack. Researchers and commentators said the findings point to rapid gains driven by greater autonomy, stronger reasoning, and improved coding ability, increasing concern over near-term misuse. Reports differed on deployment details, with some noting restrictions on GPT-5.5’s full public availability while others described the model as generally available, but the evaluations broadly agreed that leading AI systems are now highly capable at vulnerability discovery and offensive security tasks.

Get ahead of threats like this
Mallory correlates global threat intelligence with your attack surface — know if you’re exposed before adversaries strike.
How this story unfolded
3 events from the most recent confirmed update back to the earliest known activity.
GPT-5.5 reported as generally available
A later report stated that GPT-5.5 is generally available. This was presented alongside discussion of its vulnerability-finding performance relative to Mythos.
AISI warns rising AI cyber capability may drive misuse concerns
AISI interpreted the benchmark results as evidence that AI cyber capabilities are increasing rapidly due to greater autonomy, stronger reasoning, and improved coding ability. The reported findings raised concerns about near-term misuse and led to restrictions on GPT-5.5's full public availability.
AISI evaluates GPT-5.5 on offensive cybersecurity benchmarks
The UK AI Security Institute evaluated GPT-5.5 using an offensive cybersecurity benchmark built around 95 Capture The Flag challenges and longer multi-step intrusion simulations. The testing found GPT-5.5 leading on the benchmark overall, while Mythos Preview retained an edge in some extended attack simulations.
Related entities
Vulnerabilities, threat actors, malware, products, organizations, and breaches Mallory has linked to this story.
Sources
3 references tracked. Mallory keeps watching after this page renders.
OpenAI's GPT-5.5 is as Good as Mythos at Finding Security Vulnerabilities - Schneier on Security
schneier.com
Open sourceCybersécurité et IA : GPT-5.5 surclasse déjà Mythos et change l'é ...
zdnet.fr
Open sourceAmid Mythos' Hyped Cybersecurity Prowess, Researchers Find GPT-5.5 Is Just as Good
ground.news
Open sourceSee the full picture, correlated to your attack surface.
Map indicators from this story to your assets and identify affected systems in minutes.
Every observed campaign, victim, and pivot linked to actors named in this story.
Malware, exploits, and IOCs connected to the activity described here.
YARA, Sigma, and Snort rules deployed to your SIEM as soon as they’re published.
Get matching new stories delivered to your team as they break — not the next morning.
Ask questions about this story and take action on the answers.


