EU Leadership Warns of Russian Hybrid Warfare Campaign Targeting Europe
European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen publicly warned that Russia is conducting a coordinated hybrid warfare campaign against Europe, combining cyberattacks, sabotage, and disinformation to destabilize the European Union and weaken its support for Ukraine. In a speech before the European Parliament in Strasbourg, von der Leyen cited a surge in security incidents attributed to Russian state-backed actors, including the violation of Estonian airspace by Russian MiG jets and the appearance of drones over critical infrastructure in Belgium, Poland, Romania, Denmark, and Germany. The United Kingdom, though not an EU member, also reported drone incidents near civilian and military sites, prompting the deployment of a counter-drone unit to Denmark during major European summits. Von der Leyen highlighted that these incidents are not isolated but part of a deliberate and escalating campaign designed to test the EU’s resolve and unity. She referenced specific examples such as undersea cable cuts, cyberattacks that paralyzed airports and logistics hubs, and malign influence campaigns targeting European elections. The European Commission president emphasized that these actions are calculated to remain in a "grey zone" of deniability, making attribution and response more complex. She called for urgent action, urging EU leaders to develop a strategic plan in close coordination with NATO to counter these threats. The blueprint for a pan-European security response was presented to EU leaders at a recent summit in Copenhagen. Von der Leyen stressed the need for greater vigilance, technological readiness, and unity among EU member states to deter further aggression and protect European sovereignty. The campaign is seen as a direct attempt to divide the EU and undermine its support for Ukraine amid ongoing conflict. The speech marked a significant escalation in the EU’s public stance on Russian hybrid threats, moving from isolated incident response to recognizing a systematic and strategic campaign. The European Commission’s warning comes amid increasing evidence of Russia’s use of both physical and cyber means to disrupt European stability. The call to action includes enhancing countermeasures against cyberattacks, protecting critical infrastructure, and strengthening information resilience against disinformation campaigns. The EU’s response is expected to involve both defensive and offensive cyber capabilities, as well as closer intelligence sharing with NATO allies. Von der Leyen’s remarks underscore the seriousness with which European leadership now views the hybrid threat landscape, and the necessity for a unified and robust response.
Get ahead of threats like this
Mallory correlates global threat intelligence with your attack surface — know if you’re exposed before adversaries strike.
How this story unfolded
1 event from the most recent confirmed update back to the earliest known activity.
Von der Leyen warns European Parliament of Russia's 'hybrid war' on Europe
European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen told the European Parliament in Strasbourg that Russia is waging a coordinated 'hybrid war' against Europe through cyberattacks, sabotage, disinformation, airspace violations, drone activity, undersea cable cuts, and election interference. She urged EU members to treat the threat seriously and accelerate joint preparedness measures with NATO, including cyber-response capacity and broader strategic resilience planning.
Related entities
Vulnerabilities, threat actors, malware, products, organizations, and breaches Mallory has linked to this story.
Sources
2 references tracked. Mallory keeps watching after this page renders.
See the full picture, correlated to your attack surface.
Map indicators from this story to your assets and identify affected systems in minutes.
Every observed campaign, victim, and pivot linked to actors named in this story.
Malware, exploits, and IOCs connected to the activity described here.
YARA, Sigma, and Snort rules deployed to your SIEM as soon as they’re published.
Get matching new stories delivered to your team as they break — not the next morning.
Ask questions about this story and take action on the answers.
Related stories
Other stories Mallory is tracking that overlap on entities, sources, or topic labels.
Escalating Russian Hybrid Warfare and Policy Responses in Europe
New analysis warns Russia is likely to escalate its opportunistic hybrid activity in Europe into a more coordinated campaign consistent with **New Generation Warfare (NGW)** doctrine, integrating cyber operations, influence activity, and sabotage across a broader geographic footprint and at higher tempo. The assessment anticipates more synchronized, multi-domain actions designed to degrade NATO cohesion and readiness—such as pairing physical disruption (for example, airspace violations affecting critical infrastructure like airports) with cyberattacks (for example, **DDoS** against communications) to amplify operational and psychological impact. Ukrainian officials are simultaneously pushing for tighter regulation of **Telegram**, citing its repeated use by Russian intelligence to recruit locals for sabotage and terrorist attacks; the calls followed a deadly incident in Lviv that Ukrainian leadership attributed to Russia and said involved recruitment via Telegram. Separately, polling across major NATO countries indicates strong public support for treating severe hybrid actions—such as cyberattacks that shut down hospitals or power grids and sabotage of undersea cables or energy pipelines—as **acts of war**, highlighting a growing gap between public sentiment and NATO governments’ typically restrained responses to hybrid aggression.
Mar 21, 2026
Geopolitically Driven Cyber Activity and Hybrid Operations Escalate Across Europe and Major Events
Multiple reports describe an uptick in **state-linked and politically motivated cyber activity** in Europe, framed as part of broader **hybrid warfare**. Dutch intelligence (AIVD/MIVD) warned that Russia is intensifying a mix of cyberattacks, sabotage, disinformation, covert influence, and espionage designed to stay below the threshold of open conflict while testing Western red lines and undermining support for Ukraine. Related policy commentary notes growing calls from European and NATO officials for stronger “strike back” or offensive cyber capacity, but argues that political will and proportional response options—especially against proxy-driven sabotage—remain the limiting factors rather than technical capability. Separately, threat reporting tied to the **2026 Winter Olympics** indicates increased **hacktivist mobilization and targeting chatter** against Olympic-adjacent entities (e.g., transportation, sponsors, and overlapping supply chains), alongside continued targeting of the defense industrial base by a mix of hacktivists, state actors, and cybercriminals. A case study on Venezuela’s Caracas outage during “Operation Absolute Resolve” cautions against attributing major disruptions to “cyber-only” effects when available evidence also indicates substantial **kinetic/physical damage** to substations, underscoring that modern operations may integrate cyber and physical actions and that misframing can distort infrastructure security priorities.
May 7, 2026
Munich Cyber Security Conference Highlights Shift Toward Deterrence, Supply-Chain Risk, and Critical Infrastructure Resilience
Senior officials from the **EU, NATO, the United States, Sweden, Estonia, and Taiwan** used the Munich Cyber Security Conference to warn that cyber and “hybrid” operations are now a persistent feature of geopolitical competition and are increasingly aimed at **critical infrastructure** (energy, health, government services, satellites, and military command networks). EU Executive Vice President **Henna Virkkunen** argued Europe cannot be “naive” about adversaries’ ability to disrupt essential services and pointed to proposed revisions to the **EU Cybersecurity Act** intended to strengthen the EU cybersecurity agency and reduce critical ICT supply-chain risk, including phasing out designated **high-risk suppliers**. NATO Deputy Secretary General **Radmila Shekerinska** said Russia and China are challenging the alliance in both physical and digital domains and cited attempted disruptions to Poland’s energy infrastructure as an example of the threat environment. U.S. officials signaled a shift from primarily defensive “resilience” toward **deterrence** by “imposing real costs” on malicious actors, while also emphasizing deeper cyber partnerships with allies and industry to send a coordinated message to adversaries; National Cyber Director **Sean Cairncross** said a forthcoming U.S. cyber strategy will align with broader national security strategy and rely on whole-of-government tools. Estonia’s intelligence chief **Kaupo Rosin** urged Europe to invest in **homegrown offensive cyber capabilities** to reduce reliance on non-European tools, while Swedish defense official **Lisa Gustafsson** said societies must be designed to function under sustained disruption under Sweden’s “total defense” model. Taiwan’s National Security Council adviser **Yuh-Jye Lee** warned China may be rehearsing a “digital siege,” referencing activity like **Volt Typhoon** and reporting on alleged Chinese training infrastructure (“**Expedition Cloud**”) designed to simulate foreign power grids and communications networks; separate reporting also underscored that much of the technology stack underpinning cyber defense is controlled by **U.S. firms**, complicating sovereignty and supply-chain decisions.
Mar 21, 2026