Advancements in Drone Tracking, Defense, and Communications Technology
Recent developments in drone technology have led to significant changes in both civilian and military sectors. The global rollout of Remote ID mandates now requires civilian drones to continuously broadcast identification and location data, fundamentally altering operational security for organizations using drones. This new infrastructure enables real-time tracking of drone activity, raising both privacy and security considerations for information security professionals. In parallel, the integration of satellite communication capabilities directly into smartphones is eliminating traditional connectivity dead zones, enhancing both emergency response and operational continuity for users in remote areas.
On the defense front, the U.S. Army is actively testing the second generation of the vehicle-mounted LOCUST laser weapon system, designed to counter drone threats. This 20,000-watt-class laser, now integrated with modern military vehicles, features improved lethality and adaptability, aiming to provide rapid and effective protection against drone swarms. These advancements collectively highlight the accelerating convergence of drone surveillance, counter-drone measures, and resilient communications infrastructure, reshaping the landscape for both civilian and military stakeholders.
Related Entities
Organizations
Sources
Related Stories
UK and US militaries expand counter-drone authorities and domestic drone production
The UK Ministry of Defence is advancing legal changes in the *Armed Forces Bill* to give British defence personnel explicit authority to neutralize drones and other unmanned platforms deemed threatening near military bases and operations, a power currently more constrained and typically exercised by police and select agencies. The MoD cited a sharp rise in reported unmanned aerial intrusions near sensitive UK sites (266 in 2025 vs. 126 in 2024) and indicated the practical response will often rely on **electronic countermeasures** (e.g., RF jamming) rather than small-arms fire; recent examples and demonstrations referenced include RF jamming incidents and UK testing of **directed-energy** counter-drone systems (high-energy RF and laser-based capabilities). Separately, the U.S. Marine Corps’ 2nd Maintenance Battalion announced an **NDAA-compliant** modular drone, **HANX**, designed to avoid China-sourced parts and to be rapidly manufactured and repaired using **3D-printed components** in-house. The stated intent is to shorten procurement and sustainment timelines by reducing reliance on external contractors while enabling quick reconfiguration for missions ranging from reconnaissance to “one-way attack” roles, reflecting a broader push toward more secure, domestically supportable unmanned systems within U.S. defense organizations.
1 months ago
Rising Drone Threats to Military and Critical Infrastructure in Europe
The UK Ministry of Defence reported a sharp increase in **drone sightings near British military bases**, citing **266 incidents** last year versus **126 in 2024**, and linked the trend to concerns about hostile reconnaissance of sensitive defence sites, including airbases used by the **US Air Force**. In response, the UK government is moving to expand authorities under the **Armed Forces Bill** so designated military personnel can directly intervene against threatening uncrewed systems—covering **air, land, and submersible drones**—without first requiring police involvement. In Ukraine, **SpaceX and Ukrainian authorities** implemented an **emergency measure** to disable **unauthorized Starlink terminals** being used to control Russian long-range drones, following reports that Russia continued leveraging Starlink-enabled connectivity for strikes deeper inside Ukraine. Ukrainian officials characterized the action as a temporary fix that may also disrupt some legitimate users, while SpaceX and Ukraine pursue a more durable approach to prevent unauthorized use of the satellite service in contested environments—highlighting how **commercial communications infrastructure** is being exploited as part of drone-enabled warfare and broader hybrid threats across Europe.
1 months ago
Mobile Networks and Cyber Operations Enabling Drone Warfare in the Russia–Ukraine Conflict
Ukrainian hacktivists linked to the **Fenix cyber analytics center**, supported by **InformNapalm**, reported compromising accounts belonging to dozens of Russian military personnel and gaining access to monitoring systems used by Russian attack-drone operators. The operation allegedly enabled covert, near real-time surveillance of drone-operator activity and the transfer of collected data to Ukrainian Defense Forces, and it was cited in reporting around Ukraine’s decision to sanction Belarusian leader Alyaksandr Lukashenka over Belarus’s role in enabling Russia’s use of **repeater infrastructure** on Belarusian territory to extend UAV control and expand strike reach into northern Ukraine, including against energy and rail targets. Separately, Dutch intelligence services (**AIVD/MIVD**) warned that Russia is intensifying a broader **hybrid warfare** campaign across Europe—combining cyberattacks, sabotage, disinformation, covert influence, and espionage—to undermine public trust and weaken support for Ukraine while staying below the threshold of open war. In parallel, telecom-focused research highlighted how **public mobile networks** are increasingly being used as command/telemetry links for combat drones, citing examples from the Russia–Ukraine war and describing how 4G/5G standards work (e.g., 3GPP enhancements in Releases 15–18) has made cellular-connected UAV operations more feasible—raising infrastructure-security concerns for mobile operators and national critical infrastructure.
3 weeks ago