Executive Concern Grows Over AI-Enabled Identity and Sector Threats in 2026
Security leaders are increasingly prioritizing AI-enabled threats, particularly those targeting identity systems, while acknowledging gaps in readiness. The Identity Underground’s 2026 Annual Pulse survey reported that 54% of executives rank AI-enhanced identity threats as their top concern for 2026, but only 3% say they are “very prepared.” Respondents cited legacy infrastructure and manual processes as key blockers, with 82% saying legacy systems actively create identity risk; NTLM was highlighted as a common weakness (61%) that can enable lateral movement, alongside rapid growth in non-human identities (e.g., API keys, service accounts) that many organizations cannot fully inventory.
In the health sector, Health-ISAC’s 2026 Global Health Sector Threat Landscape similarly elevated AI-driven attacks as the leading concern for 2026, alongside supply chain vulnerabilities, drawing on sector reporting such as its ransomware events database and indicator-sharing/alerting programs. Separately, CSO Online’s “CISO predictions for 2026” package is broader, aggregating multiple forward-looking items (including AI and cybercrime themes) rather than detailing the same identity-focused survey findings or the Health-ISAC health-sector report.
Get ahead of threats like this
Mallory correlates global threat intelligence with your attack surface — know if you’re exposed before adversaries strike.
How this story unfolded
2 events from the most recent confirmed update back to the earliest known activity.
Identity Underground report highlights AI identity preparedness gap
A report from The Identity Underground found that more than half of executives ranked AI-enhanced identity threats as their top concern for 2026, while only a small minority felt highly prepared to defend against them. The report attributed the gap to legacy identity infrastructure, manual processes, and growing challenges around non-human identities and outdated authentication such as NTLM.
Health-ISAC publishes 2026 health sector threat report
Health-ISAC released its Annual Threat Report for the health sector, providing its 2026 assessment of the cyber threat landscape affecting healthcare organizations.
Related entities
Vulnerabilities, threat actors, malware, products, organizations, and breaches Mallory has linked to this story.
Sources
2 references tracked. Mallory keeps watching after this page renders.
See the full picture, correlated to your attack surface.
Map indicators from this story to your assets and identify affected systems in minutes.
Every observed campaign, victim, and pivot linked to actors named in this story.
Malware, exploits, and IOCs connected to the activity described here.
YARA, Sigma, and Snort rules deployed to your SIEM as soon as they’re published.
Get matching new stories delivered to your team as they break — not the next morning.
Ask questions about this story and take action on the answers.
Related stories
Other stories Mallory is tracking that overlap on entities, sources, or topic labels.
2026 Cybersecurity Outlook Emphasizes AI-Driven Risk, Identity Attacks, and Operational Resilience
Allianz’s latest risk survey again ranks **cyber incidents** as the top global business risk, citing ransomware, data theft, service outages, and regulatory exposure as persistent drivers of business interruption and loss of trust. The report highlights growing systemic exposure from heavy reliance on a small set of cloud and external service providers, where a single provider disruption or compromise can cascade across customers and partners; it also notes **AI** is rapidly rising as a planning factor for disruption, resilience, and recovery. CISO and practitioner commentary for 2026 similarly prioritizes hardening cloud/AI environments and treating **identity as the active perimeter**, with expectations of more impersonation, session hijacking, and token theft that can bypass traditional MFA. Recommended strategic responses include moving toward **zero-trust-by-default** across infrastructure and CI/CD, strengthening supply-chain and vendor controls, and operationalizing resilience through repeatable recovery practices (e.g., routine failover and rehearsed response) rather than relying on tooling, dashboards, or compliance artifacts alone.
Mar 21, 2026
CISO and Security Leadership Outlook for 2026: AI-Driven Threats, Identity-Centric Defense, and Workforce Strain
Security leaders are signaling that **2026 risk will be dominated by faster, cheaper, and more credible attacks enabled by AI and automation**, with adversaries increasingly targeting **identity and cloud access** rather than endpoints. Commentary highlighted growing exposure from “internet monoculture” concentration in major cloud/CDN/productivity providers, rising **deepfake/voice-cloning and synthetic-identity** abuse that erodes trust in authentication, and longer-term **“collect now, decrypt later”** concerns tied to quantum risk. In parallel, organizations are being pushed toward operating models emphasizing **speed, automation, and continuous identity verification**, while also updating resiliency playbooks to explicitly account for AI behavior and accountability. Operationally, workforce data indicates **U.S. cybersecurity leaders average ~10.8 hours of overtime per week**, with reported burnout and expanding responsibilities as AI governance and business-risk communication become more central to the role. Several items in the set are not incident-driven: one is a conference write-up (ThreatLocker’s *Zero Trust World 2026*) and others are strategy/career pieces (secure-by-design/SDLC applied to governance and human error; CSO role definition). One reference points to a distinct law-enforcement action—**a 14-country operation that dismantled the LeakBase cybercrime marketplace**—which is a separate event from the 2026 leadership/outlook theme, and another appears to be a vendor/platform expansion blurb rather than a specific threat or disclosure.
Apr 27, 2026
2026 Cybersecurity Outlook Focused on Agentic AI, Machine Identities, and Compliance Pressure
Multiple 2026 outlook pieces warn that rapid adoption of **agentic AI** and expanding **non-human identities (NHIs)** will increase breach risk by creating overprivileged machine identities and automation that can act with insufficient governance. Security leaders cited risks including “agency abuse,” runaway automation, and deepfake-enabled erosion of trust signals, with the expectation that AI governance, identity controls, and accountability will become board-level priorities as organizations operationalize autonomous systems in production environments. Separately, enterprise leaders anticipate continued strain from **talent shortages** and the need to justify AI/automation ROI while balancing cybersecurity and cloud priorities, alongside persistent complexity in **privacy and cybersecurity compliance** as regulations evolve and AI expands data-sharing and third-party risk. One roundup item points to ongoing regional threat activity (e.g., **MuddyWater** spear-phishing delivering a Rust-based RAT) but does not materially connect to the agentic-AI/NHI theme, while a conference list is primarily an events calendar rather than substantive threat or vulnerability reporting.
Mar 21, 2026